Ask SAILee!

Do you have a question about software architecture, cloud computing, application modernization, or IT complexity? Ask SAILee! SAILee is the AI voice of Lee Atchison, the noted cloud architect, author, and leader in architecting scalable applications. Ask any question, and you'll get answers based on the books, articles, and other content created by Lee Atchison.

Ask SAILee

Don’t Let Your Application Turn into Another Winchester Mystery House

Some time ago when I was living in Silicon Valley, I often drove by a curious-looking structure called the Winchester Mystery House every day on my way to work. The Winchester Mystery House is a San Jose mansion that was once the home of Sarah Winchester, the widow of William Winchester, and the heir to the Winchester Rifle fortune. Originally purchased in 1884 as an unfinished eight-room farmhouse, it was expanded over the course of 36 years to an overall footprint of 24,000 square feet.  

Although it’s been years since I’ve seen it in person, I often think about that place when I consider the ramifications of Agile development and DevOps processes.

Every Agile process shares the same guiding principle: incremental software development. The basic idea is to build the minimum viable product (MVP) to solve the current business need and then incrementally add more features and capabilities based on feedback and experience. If all goes well, the product will evolve into exactly what you need it to be, and it will be done with a minimum of investment.

Meanwhile, there’s DevOps, which allows teams to integrate new products and features quickly and easily by relying on CI/CD (continuous integration and continuous deployment).

Combined, Agile development and DevOps make a potent pair. They shorten the feedback cycle dramatically, allowing you to constantly adjust your applications to meet the needs of your customers.

Yet, whenever I think of Agile and DevOps, my mind can’t help but take me back to the specter of the Winchester Mystery House.

Here’s why.

The dangers of building without a blueprint

Although it started out as a relatively modest farmhouse, the Winchester mansion ultimately expanded to a total of 160 rooms. Each individual room is exquisitely crafted and beautiful in its own way. But there’s a problem. As far as we know, Sarah Winchester never had a grand plan for the house’s overall design. The house was built incrementally and obsessively. There was no blueprint for where it was ultimately headed.

The Winchester Mystery House may have been able to take advantage of the finest builders and craftsmen of the time, but what it sorely lacked was an architect. Internally, each room may be precious and beautiful, but externally it’s a chaotic sprawl.

Incrementally building your software leaves you subject to the same pitfalls that Sarah Winchester faced. What is lost in this laser-like focus on continuous improvement is a solid systemic architecture to guide your product development and ensure that fundamental issues, such as resiliency and scalability, are part of the equation. Without them, each change you make increases your technical debt. As your needs grow, your system becomes harder to support, harder to expand, and less capable. Any short-term benefits you may derive from this approach are offset by huge long-term costs.  

Make no mistake, there’s nothing wrong with incremental development and deployment. They can be critical in adapting to customer feedback. But this is just part of the total picture. The missing piece in many an application development project is architecture. There’s no reason why the two can’t amicably coexist. Even if you are building your product incrementally, it is vital to devote some of your focus on an overall architecture strategy, and crucial to consider how individual decisions and shortcuts made in the name of expediency will impact that strategy.

Appoint someone to “own” the long-term architectural vision

The easiest way to ensure that architecture remains top of mind is to designate someone whose job is to “own” the overall architectural vision of your product, and it’s important that whomever you choose remains outside of the Agile process. In that way, when the rest of the team is focused on quickly adapting and adjusting the product to meet changing customer needs, you’ll have one person who continues to maintain a long-term vision of what you want to build, and who can make sure that short-term decisions don’t have unwelcome long-term implications and costs.

Some might point to the Winchester Mystery House and see it as an example of the benefits of Agile development without an architect. After all, the house is one of the most popular tourist destinations in San Jose. And yet, what is it that makes the mansion such a hit with visitors? It isn’t the excellence in craftsmanship and building. It’s the haphazard nature of the house —it has doors and stairs that lead to nowhere and windows that provide views of other rooms. These oddities lead to the impression that the house is haunted, and this is what draws people to the house.

Agile development and continuous integration and deployment have quickly become necessities in this era of constant adaptation and adjustment. But if you want to avoid turning your application development project into a costly, sprawling nightmare, do what Sarah Winchester failed to do—be sure to designate an architect.

More articles from Lee Atchison:


The Big Cloud Migration Misstep

In all the different ways we know in order to migrate an application to the cloud, the lift-and-shift strategy is often the first method organizations attempt. It’s a simple concept: take your existing applications and move them, as is, to the cloud. But simplicity can be deceptive. I’ve seen firsthand how this approach can lead to a host of issues, particularly when it comes to the underutilization of dynamic cloud resources.

Migrating to the cloud using lift-and-shift may be the most expensive mistake you make when implementing a cloud migration.

The Illusion of Lift-and-Shift

The appeal of lift-and-shift is clear—it promises a quick and painless transition to the cloud. But this is an illusion. By not re-architecting applications to leverage the cloud’s dynamic capabilities, organizations are essentially moving into a new home but living out of their moving boxes. They miss out on the opportunity to optimize their applications for the cloud environment.

Renting the Office Building

How efficient would it be for a business to rent an entire office building, when it usually only needs a few rooms? This is exactly what you are doing when you move your application, unchanged, to the cloud using static resources.

One of the most significant drawbacks of lift-and-shift is cost. The cloud’s economic model is built around its dynamic nature—its ability to automatically and dynamically scale resources to match demand. Lift-and-shift migrations ignore this model, leading to static resource allocation that often costs more than traditional data center operations.

Applications that could benefit from the cloud’s scalability are left constrained by the fixed resources allocated to them. During peak demand, they can’t scale up, leading to potential performance degradation or service failure. In quieter times, the opposite happens. Applications can be significantly over-provisioned, wasting money on unused capacity.

Scalability: The Lost Advantage

Scalability is one of the cloud’s greatest strengths. Lift-and-shift migrations squander this advantage. They prevent organizations from responding swiftly to market changes and customer demands. In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, this lack of agility can be a critical misstep.

The solution to these problems is to embrace the cloud’s dynamic resources. This involves re-architecting applications to be cloud-native and taking advantage of services like auto-scaling, serverless computing, and managed databases.

It’s a process that requires more effort upfront but pays dividends in efficiency, performance, and cost savings.


Lift-and-shift is a tempting shortcut for cloud migration, but it’s a path fraught with hidden costs and missed opportunities. To truly benefit from the cloud, organizations must go beyond this rudimentary strategy and tap into the dynamic resources that make the cloud such a powerful platform for innovation and growth.


Welcome to
Software Architecture Insights

Software Architecture Insights is your go-to resource for empowering software architects and aspiring professionals with the knowledge and tools required to navigate the complex landscape of modern software design. SAI provides invaluable insights into crucial aspects of software architecture, including cloud computing, application security, scalability, availability, and more.

Whether you're a seasoned architect looking to stay up-to-date with the latest industry trends or a prospective software architect eager to build a strong foundation in this dynamic field, our platform is here to guide you in making informed decisions that will shape the success of your software projects. Join us on a journey of discovery, learning, and mastery as we delve deep into the architectural principles that drive innovation and excellence in the world of software.

Managing Complexity in a Cloud Migration

Migrating to the cloud can be daunting, especially when dealing with complex applications, which can have a life of their own. These applications can act in seemingly random ways when exposed to unexpected stimuli, such as moving from a stable data center environment to a more chaotic cloud environment. This inherent complexity makes migrating to the cloud risky, but there are ways to mitigate the risk.

Piecemeal Migration

Proper pre-migration preparation is critical to a successful cloud migration. You can often make simple—or more complex—changes to your application to prepare it for the migration. Common changes include reducing the dependency on specific networking topology, changing how you establish database connections, changing data and caching strategies, removing reliance on server-local data, refactoring configuration mechanisms and strategies, and changing how firewalls and other security components interact with the application.

Often, a large monolithic application is split into smaller applications or services before it is considered safe to be moved to the cloud. Smaller pieces are easier to move to the cloud, especially when each is moved independently. By performing a migration one component at a time, you limit the risk of a given migration step and simplify the inherent complexity in each migrated module by limiting the scope of the migration.

This piecemeal strategy, often called a service-by-service migration, is common for applications composed of multiple services or microservices. However, it can also be used for monolithic applications by performing pre-migration application architecture changes.

Using this technique can assist in migrating large monoliths to a more service-based architecture during the migration process, yet the complexity of such a migration can still be extensive.

Post-Migration Complexity

The journey doesn't end once the migration to the cloud is complete. Post-migration optimization is crucial to ensure that the application not only survives but thrives in its new environment.

For example, after the migration is complete, continuous monitoring is essential. Cloud environments are dynamic, with resources being scaled up or down based on demand. This can lead to new performance bottlenecks that weren’t present in the static data center environment. Implementing robust monitoring tools that can provide real-time analytics will help you understand how your application performs under various loads and identify areas for improvement.

Cost Optimization

Complex applications can also impact expected cloud cost savings. Without proper management, an unwieldy complex application can spiral cloud costs out of control. Preventing this requires additional analysis and work. Cloud cost management tools can help with this, but a lack of understanding of how the application's complexities impact cloud costs will make cost control problematic long term.

Security Complexity

Finally, your migrated application will have new and evolving security challenges in its new environment. It’s critical the migrated application undergo a security review. The more complex your application is, the more likely an unknown security vulnerability will impact your application’s ability to perform as needed.

Remember, even though the cloud provider is responsible for the security of the cloud itself, you are responsible for the security of your application in the cloud.

Cloud-Native Capabilities

Cloud-native features such as auto-scaling, serverless computing, and managed services are among the values of the cloud that attract many companies to consider cloud migration. Yet many of these features are unavailable for existing applications. Refactoring a highly complex monolith application into something that can leverage, for example, serverless computing, is a big and risky undertaking that is often too costly to justify.

Pre-Migration Preparation to Reduce Complexity Growth

Often, the best strategy for a successful migration is to reduce the uncertainty involved in the migration itself. Uncertainty during the migration can lead to random or ununified decision-making, which can lead to anincrease in the complexity of an application during the migration.

These sorts of migration-related issues are often unavoidable, but pre-migration preparation can help immeasurably reduce this complexity growth. Pre-migration preparation is essential to maintaining control during the migration.

Yet pre-migration preparation is difficult with many large applications simply due to their initial complexity.

Managing Complexity Via Chaos

Chaos engineering is a practice often considered for managing application complexity and is particularly useful in a cloud environment. Chaos engineering involves deliberately injecting failures into a system to test its resilience and ability to withstand turbulent conditions in production. By doing so, you can identify weaknesses and improve the overall reliability of your application. The goal is to make your system more resilient to failures so that it can continue to function even when things go wrong. This is especially important in the cloud, where failures are more common due to the dynamic and distributed nature of the infrastructure.

Intentionally injecting failures allows you to build robust mechanisms to counteract those failures. This includes improving the application code itself and improving the tooling used to monitor and resolve issues in production. These tools can include improved performance monitoring tools, complexity analysis tools, and problem diagnostics tools. Chaos engineering involves improving your team’s processes and procedures for responding to issues that arise. By building more resilient tools and processes to respond to these failures, you increase the overall reliability of your application in the long term, and your overall application resiliency naturally increases.

Yet, chaos engineering can be challenging to implement, and the cultural changes required to accept a chaos-oriented culture can be daunting. This makes it impractical for many companies to consider.

Managing Complexity Using Software Intelligence

Given all of this, understanding the complexities of how your application works internally is critical to a successful cloud migration. However, for large, unwieldy, monolithic applications, this is not an easy or straightforward task. You can’t simply study your way to understanding your application’s intricacies.

Recent advances in software analysis are making understanding complex applications more practical. With the advent of AI and software intelligence technology, understanding complex software systems is becoming more viable.

These software intelligence technologies analyze your application and can be used to answer critical questions necessary to make your migration a success. They can help determine what underlying assumptions are built into a complex code base and which require adjustments when moving to the cloud. Software intelligence technology can also assist in answering migration-related questions, such as how will timing changes inherent in the planned cloud infrastructure migration impact my application.

Previously, many of these questions and concerns were answered haphazardly, but AI-driven software intelligence technologies can make these determinations faster and more comprehensive. This reduces the risk of migration-related failures.

Static vs Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic analysis, such as that provided by performance monitoring tools like Dynatrace, gives intelligence about software behavior during runtime. In other words, it sheds light on how the application behaves post-migration. While helpful, it doesn’t give clear and concise guidance on an application’s issues before the migration starts. Hence, the migration is often an unstable, iterative process.

Static software intelligence, such as CAST, provides actionable insights into the internal software structures before the migration process begins. This results in less random decision-making, making the migration itself less risky and more predictable.


Cloud migration is a complex process, particularly for intricate applications accustomed to stable data center environments. The unpredictability of cloud infrastructures increases the risk, but strategic preparation can mitigate it.

Large, monolithic applications often benefit from being divided into smaller, independent services, easing the transition and reducing risks. This service-by-service migration approach simplifies complexity and is also applicable to monolithic systems through architectural modifications. Despite the challenges, this strategy can gradually transform monoliths into service-oriented architectures during the migration.

After a migration is complete, additional complexity added to an application during the migration becomes a challenge. Continuous monitoring is vital to identify new performance bottlenecks and optimize resource scaling. Cloud costs become hard to manage.

AI and software intelligence technology can help immeasurably ease the application complexity that can burden a cloud migration by reducing the risk of unknowns prevalent in a complex application. This technology can turn a risky, complex, error-prone migration into a well-orchestrated, well-planned, manageable process.


Frequently Asked Questions (Ask SAILee)

Do you have questions about software architecture, cloud computing, or application modernization?

Make sure to ask SAILee!

SAILee will provide high-quality, professional replies to questions based on the books, articles, courses, and other content created by Lee Atchison.

Here are some examples:

·      What are some specific tools or technologies recommended for implementing chaos engineering effectively during a cloud migration? To implement chaos engineering effectively during a cloud migration, several specific tools and technologies are recommended. One of the most well-known tools is Chaos Monkey, part of the Netflix Simian Army, which randomly disables instances in production to ensure that services can tolerate instance failures. Gremlin is another comprehensive chaos engineering platform that allows for controlled, deliberate experiments to test the resilience of systems. Additionally, Chaos Toolkit provides a framework for writing, running, and sharing chaos engineering experiments. These tools help simulate various failure scenarios, enabling teams to observe system behavior under stress and improve the robustness of their applications.

·      How can a company determine the appropriate balance between refactoring a monolithic application and adopting cloud-native features without incurring excessive costs or risks?Determining the appropriate balance between refactoring a monolithic application and adopting cloud-native features involves careful planning and analysis. Companies should start by assessing the current state of their applications and identifying the most critical components that would benefit from cloud-native features such as auto-scaling, serverless computing, and managed services. It's crucial to perform a cost-benefit analysis to understand the potential return on investment for refactoring efforts. Sometimes, a hybrid approach may be necessary, where only the most critical or resource-intensive parts of the application are refactored for cloud-native capabilities, while other parts remain in their original state. Consulting with cloud migration experts and using software intelligence technologies can also help make informed decisions that minimize risks and costs.

·      What are some common pitfalls or mistakes companies make during the pre-migration preparation phase, and how can they be avoided? Common pitfalls during the pre-migration preparation phase include underestimating the complexity of existing applications, failing to adequately plan for dependency changes, and not accounting for security implications in the new environment. To avoid these mistakes, companies should conduct thorough assessments of their applications to understand all dependencies and potential issues that might arise during migration. It's also important to invest in proper training for the team on cloud technologies and to develop a detailed migration plan that includes contingency strategies for potential failures. Regular security reviews and adopting a robust security framework from the beginning can help mitigate security-related risks. Pre-migration testing and pilot migrations can also provide valuable insights and help identify issues early in the process, ensuring a smoother overall migration.

7 Essential Tips for Setting Up Effective Monitoring

As the world of software development continues to evolve at a rapid pace, organizations are increasingly turning to tools such as Kubernetes to deploy, scale, and manage their containerized applications. Kubernetes and containers have, in particular, revolutionized how we build and deploy applications, but with this power comes the responsibility of ensuring our systems' health, performance, and reliability. This is where effective monitoring comes into play.

I've spent years working with companies of all sizes, helping them navigate the complexities of modern application architecture. Throughout my journey, I've learned that setting up a robust monitoring system is critical to the success of any system deployment. In this article, I'll share with you seven essential tips that I believe every organization should follow when setting up a modern monitoring strategy.

1. Define Clear Monitoring Goals and Objectives

Before you start configuring your monitoring setup, take a step back and ask yourself: What do you want to achieve with monitoring? What are the key metrics and logs that matter most to your applications? What level of visibility do you need into your cluster's performance? By defining clear goals and objectives upfront, you can ensure that your monitoring efforts are aligned with your business needs and provide meaningful insights.

2. Leverage Native Monitoring Tools

Kubernetes, in particular, comes with built-in monitoring tools that can give you a solid foundation for your monitoring setup. Familiarize yourself with tools like Metrics Server, which collects resource metrics from Kubelets and exposes them through the Kubernetes API. The Kubernetes Dashboard is another handy tool that provides a web-based UI to view and manage your cluster. Whatever your environment, understand the native monitoring tools available to you and leverage them into your overall monitoring strategy.

3. Implement a Multi-Layered Monitoring Approach

To gain a comprehensive view of your application environment, it's crucial to adopt a multi-layered monitoring approach. This means monitoring at different levels of the stack, including cluster-level metrics (e.g., node CPU and memory usage), pod-level metrics (e.g., resource utilization and restart counts), and application-level metrics (e.g., response times and error rates). By monitoring at multiple layers, you can quickly identify issues and gain a holistic understanding of your system's health.

4. Choose the Right Monitoring Tools for Your Needs

The modern application monitoring ecosystem offers a wide range of open-source and commercial monitoring tools. When selecting tools, consider scalability, ease of integration, alerting capabilities, and compatibility with your existing infrastructure. Popular open-source tools like Prometheus and Grafana have gained significant traction due to their powerful features and extensibility. Commercial solutions like Datadog and New Relic provide additional capabilities and support. Choose tools that align with your specific requirements and budget.

5. Collect and Analyze Metrics and Logs

Metrics and logs are the lifeblood of effective modern application monitoring. Collecting and analyzing metrics helps you track key performance indicators (KPIs) and identify trends and anomalies. Use tools like Prometheus or Datadog to scrape metrics from your components and applications. For log aggregation and analysis, consider solutions like Papertrail, Logstash, or the popular ELK stack. Make sure to centralize your logs in order to leverage powerful querying and visualization capabilities. This allows you to gain insights into application behavior and troubleshoot issues more efficiently.

6. Set Up Alerts and Notifications

Proactive monitoring is essential for minimizing downtime and ensuring the smooth operation of your applications. Set up alerts and notifications based on predefined thresholds for critical metrics and events. For example, configure alerts for high CPU usage, low disk space, or a sudden surge in error rates. Use tools like PagerDuty to route alerts to the appropriate channels, such as email, Slack, or incident management systems. Timely notifications enable your team to respond to potential issues and take corrective actions quickly.

7. Continuously Refine and Optimize Your Monitoring Setup

Application monitoring is an ongoing process that requires continuous refinement and optimization. As your application and infrastructure evolve, so should your monitoring setup. Regularly review your monitoring dashboards, alerts, and metrics to ensure they remain relevant and effective. Engage with your teams to gather feedback and identify areas for improvement. Stay up to date with the latest monitoring best practices and tools. Continuously iterate and improve your monitoring setup to adapt to the changing needs of your applications and infrastructure.

In conclusion, setting up effective modern application monitoring is not a one-time task, but a continuous journey of iteration and improvement. By following the seven essential tips outlined in this article, you can establish a robust monitoring foundation that empowers you to manage your environment proactively. Remember, effective monitoring is key to ensuring your applications' health, performance, and reliability.

As you embark on your observability journey, keep in mind that the goal is not just to collect data, but to derive actionable insights that drive meaningful improvements. By staying proactive, continuously refining your monitoring setup, and fostering a culture of observability, you can and will deliver exceptional value to your users.

Frequently Asked Questions (Ask SAI)

  • How do you balance the performance impact of monitoring with the need for comprehensive visibility? Balancing performance with requires careful planning and optimization. One approach is to implement sampling and rate-limiting techniques to reduce the volume of collected data. Instead of capturing every single metric and log, focus on the most critical data points that provide meaningful insights into system performance and health. Using lightweight monitoring agents and optimizing the frequency of data collection can also help minimize the performance overhead. Additionally, it's important to regularly review and refine your monitoring setup to eliminate unnecessary metrics and reduce noise. This is an oft-overlooked step in a company’s observability strategy. Yet, it is critical to ensure that your monitoring system remains efficient and effective without significantly impacting the performance of your application.

  • What are the best practices for setting up monitoring in a multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environment? Setting up monitoring in a multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environment involves addressing several unique challenges. First and foremost, you must ensure that your monitoring tools are compatible with the various cloud platforms and on-premises infrastructure you have selected. This isn’t as easy as it sounds, because many tools may “work” in multiple environments, yet they are optimized for only a few. Selecting the “right” tool or tools often can involve trial and error as applied to the various cloud and non-cloud environments. Network latency and data transfer costs can also be significant factors in multi-cloud setups, so it's important to optimize data collection and processing to minimize these impacts. Whatever you do, make sure you use a centralized monitoring platform that can aggregate across all your cloud and non-cloud environments, giving a single plane-of-glass view of your entire application.

  • How can you ensure security and compliance when collecting and storing monitoring data?Ensuring security and compliance when collecting and storing monitoring data involves several key practices. First, implement robust access controls to restrict who can view and manage monitoring data. Use encryption to protect data both in transit and at rest, ensuring that sensitive information remains secure. Regularly audit your monitoring setup and data access logs to detect and respond to any unauthorized access or anomalies. But, most importantly, make sure you filter non-essential personally identifiable information (PII), such as email addresses and credit card numbers. This information, while critical to your application, is rarely relevant to your application monitoring. Compliance with relevant regulations, such as GDPR or HIPAA, requires careful handling of this and other data. Treating the security concerns of your monitoring solutions as a serious concern is essential in ensuring that you stay safe and compliant.

Don’t Worry about AI Taking Over Your Job

As someone who has spent decades at the forefront of the tech industry, I've seen firsthand how emerging technologies can disrupt the status quo. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), it's natural to wonder about its potential impact on the job market, particularly for roles that rely on uniquely human skills. However, I believe that most human-centric jobs, including writers, actors, and lawyers, will not only survive but thrive in the age of AI.

The recently released Stanford University's AI Index report for 2024 supports this view, highlighting that AI systems still struggle to match human performance in tasks that require complex cognitive abilities and emotional intelligence. This finding is crucial because it underscores the enduring value of human-centric skills in the face of technological change.

Take writing, for example. While AI language models can generate impressive output, they lack the creativity, empathy, and unique voice that define great writing. As a writer myself, I know that the best writing comes from a place of authentic emotion and lived experience—something that AI simply cannot replicate. The same holds true for actors, who must draw upon their interpersonal skills and emotional depth to create compelling performances.

Moreover, human-centric jobs often require a level of adaptability and contextual understanding that AI has yet to master. Lawyers, for example, must navigate complex human dynamics, building trust with clients and persuading juries with empathy and strategic reasoning. While AI can certainly streamline legal research and document review, it is no substitute for the human judgment and interpersonal skills at the heart of legal practice.

The AI Index Report 2024 also suggests that AI is more likely to augment human-centric jobs than to replace them outright. This aligns with my experience in the tech industry, where I've seen how AI can take on routine tasks, freeing up professionals to focus on higher-level, creative work. For writers, AI-powered tools can help with grammar and style suggestions, and even help reduce writer’s block by providing ideas for new directions.

As AI continues to evolve, I believe the nature of human-centric jobs will also adapt. In a world where machines excel at data analysis and number crunching, the value of uniquely human skills like empathy, creativity, and critical thinking will only increase. The most successful professionals will be those who can effectively navigate the interface between human and machine, leveraging the strengths of both to drive innovation and solve complex challenges.

Of course, I don't want to downplay the potential for disruption. As with any major technological shift, there will be a need for workers to adapt and upskill. But I firmly believe that the core value proposition of human-centric jobs—the ability to bring a unique blend of cognitive and interpersonal skills to complex tasks—will endure.

In the end, the rise of AI presents an opportunity for humans and machines to work together in powerful new ways. By recognizing the unique strengths of both human intelligence and artificial intelligence, we can harness the power of AI to augment and enhance human-centric jobs, not replace them. The future of work belongs to those who can effectively navigate this new frontier, and I, for one, am excited to see what the future holds.

Frequently Asked Questions (Ask SAI)

  • What specific skills or training should professionals in human-centric jobs focus on to remain competitive in an AI-augmented job market?

    For professionals in human-centric jobs to remain competitive in an AI-augmented job market, they should focus on developing skills that emphasize their uniquely human abilities. This includes honing emotional intelligence, creativity, critical thinking, and interpersonal communication. Additionally, gaining proficiency in using AI tools and understanding their capabilities can help professionals leverage these technologies to enhance their work. Upskilling in areas like data literacy, digital collaboration, and the ability to interpret and apply AI-generated insights will also be crucial.

  • How can AI be integrated into human-centric jobs without compromising the unique qualities that make these roles valuable?

    Integrating AI into human-centric jobs without compromising their unique qualities requires a thoughtful approach. One strategy is to use AI for routine and repetitive tasks, allowing professionals to focus on more complex and creative aspects of their work. For example, in writing, AI can assist with grammar checks and idea generation, freeing writers to concentrate on crafting authentic and compelling narratives. In the legal field, AI can handle document review and research, enabling lawyers to devote more time to client interactions and strategic decision-making. Ensuring that AI tools are designed to complement rather than replace human skills is key to maintaining the value of these roles.

  • What potential risks or ethical considerations should be addressed when integrating AI into human-centric professions?

    When integrating AI into human-centric professions, several potential risks and ethical considerations need to be addressed. One major concern is ensuring that AI systems are transparent and their decision-making processes are understandable to human users. This is important to maintain trust and accountability. Additionally, there is a risk of over-reliance on AI, which could lead to the erosion of essential human skills and judgment. Ethical considerations also include addressing bias in AI systems, ensuring data privacy, and preventing the displacement of workers without adequate support for retraining and transition. Balancing the benefits of AI with these potential challenges is essential for ethical and effective integration.

AI Is Advancing, Yet Still Falls Short of Human Intelligence

In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence (AI), getting caught up in the hype is easy. After all, computer intelligence appears poised to surpass human intelligence in every domain.

However, despite the remarkable progress AI has made in recent years, there are still areas where humans maintain a clear advantage. According to Stanford University's AI Index report for 2024, AI systems continue to lag behind human performance in tasks that require complex cognitive abilities, such as advanced mathematics and visual commonsense reasoning.

This revelation may surprise those who have been inundated with headlines touting AI's superhuman capabilities in everything from chess and Go to language translation and image recognition, to the brand new, amazingly human-like ChatGPT-4o capabilities.

While it's true that AI has achieved remarkable feats in these domains, it's essential to understand that these successes are largely confined to narrow, well-defined tasks for which AI systems can be specifically trained.

AI often struggles to match human performance when it comes to more open-ended, cognitively demanding tasks. Take advanced mathematics, for example. While AI can crunch numbers and perform calculations with lightning speed, it lacks the intuitive understanding and creative problem-solving skills that human mathematicians bring to the table. Humans have the ability to discern patterns, develop novel strategies, and apply abstract reasoning in ways that AI systems simply can't replicate.

Similarly, in the realm of visual commonsense reasoning, humans have a clear edge over machines. We can look at a complex scene and instantly make sense of it, drawing upon our vast repository of real-world knowledge and experience to interpret what we see. We can infer relationships, emotions, and intentions from subtle cues and context, allowing us to navigate social situations and make split-second decisions with ease.

In contrast, AI systems often struggle when confronted with visual tasks that require commonsense reasoning. They may be able to identify objects and people in an image with high accuracy, but they lack a deeper understanding of how these elements relate to one another and what they imply about the larger context. This limitation becomes particularly apparent in real-world scenarios, where the ability to interpret and respond to nuanced social cues can mean the difference between success and failure.

So, what sets humans apart in these complex cognitive tasks? The answer lies in our unique blend of intuition, creativity, and adaptability. Humans have the remarkable ability to learn from a wide range of experiences, to draw connections between seemingly disparate concepts, and to apply our knowledge in novel ways to solve problems we've never encountered before. We can think outside the box, generate new ideas, and adapt our strategies on the fly in response to changing circumstances.

In contrast, AI systems are largely limited by the data they are trained on and the specific algorithms they employ. They excel at many things, such as advanced pattern recognition, but they struggle to generalize their knowledge to new situations or to think creatively in the face of uncertainty.

This is why, despite their impressive performance on specific benchmarks, AI systems often fail to match human performance in more open-ended, cognitively demanding tasks.

Where Can AI Help?

Of course, this is not to say that AI has no role to play in these areas of expertise. On the contrary, AI can be a powerful tool for augmenting and enhancing human intelligence.


That’s the keyAI plays the role of powerful tool to assist human intelligence, not replace it.


By leveraging the speed and accuracy of AI systems to handle routine tasks and crunch large datasets, humans can free up cognitive bandwidth to focus on higher-level, creative problem-solving. The key is to recognize the unique strengths of both humans and machines and to develop symbiotic relationships that allow each to excel in their respective domains.

As we continue to push the boundaries of what's possible with AI, it's essential that we maintain a realistic understanding of its limitations and avoid falling into the trap of believing that machines can replace human intelligence in every domain. While AI will undoubtedly continue to make remarkable progress in the years to come, there will always be a vital role for human intuition, creativity, and adaptability in tackling the most complex and cognitively demanding tasks.

In the end, the true power of AI lies not in its ability to surpass human intelligence, but in its potential to augment and enhance it. By recognizing the unique strengths of both humans and machines, we can harness the power of AI to solve complex problems, drive innovation, and push the boundaries of what's possible. But we must never lose sight of the irreplaceable value of human cognition and the vital role it will continue to play in shaping our world.

Frequently Asked Questions (Ask SAI)

  • What specific tasks or areas of expertise are AI systems currently unable to handle that require human cognitive abilities?

    AI systems are currently unable to handle tasks that require nuanced understanding, creative problem-solving, and intuitive reasoning. For example, while AI can perform calculations and recognize patterns in data, it struggles with advanced mathematics that involves developing novel strategies and abstract reasoning. Additionally, AI falls short in visual commonsense reasoning, where humans excel at interpreting complex scenes, inferring relationships, emotions, and intentions from subtle cues and context. This human ability to draw upon a vast repository of real-world knowledge and experience is something AI systems currently cannot replicate.

  • How can AI and human intelligence be effectively integrated to enhance performance in complex tasks?

    To effectively integrate AI and human intelligence, it is essential to leverage the strengths of both. AI can handle routine tasks and process large datasets quickly and accurately, freeing up humans to focus on higher-level, creative problem-solving. This symbiotic relationship allows humans to use their unique abilities in intuition, creativity, and adaptability to tackle complex problems, while AI provides support in areas where it excels, such as advanced pattern recognition and data processing. Effective integration involves developing systems where AI augments human intelligence rather than attempting to replace it, ensuring that both can excel in their respective domains.

  • What advancements or breakthroughs are needed for AI to improve its performance in tasks requiring intuition, creativity, and adaptability?

    For AI to improve its performance in tasks requiring intuition, creativity, and adaptability, several advancements and breakthroughs are needed. One significant area is the development of more sophisticated algorithms that can generalize knowledge across different contexts and learn from a broader range of experiences. Additionally, enhancing AI's ability to interpret and respond to nuanced social cues and contextual information would bring it closer to human-like reasoning. Breakthroughs in fields such as neural networks, natural language processing, and cognitive computing could contribute to these improvements, allowing AI to better mimic the flexible and adaptive nature of human cognition.

What is Software Architecture Insights?

Software Architecture Insights is a regular newsletter providing insights into architecting your modern applications at scale. Modern digital businesses continually struggle with building new and innovative applications that also maintain high availability at cloud-scale.

Software Architecture Insights gives you, well, insights into how tech leaders and software architects function effectively. Learn how to build, operate, and maintain applications at scale, innovate new features and capabilities, and keep teams fully engaged. All while effectively managing IT complexity and technical debt.

Insightful …